ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Design of Bacterial Cultures in Fermented Functional Maize Product Formulation
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Nutrition and Food Quality Assessment, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
2
Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic
3
State Institute for Drug Control, Bratislava, Kvetná 11, 825 08 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Zuzana Matejčeková   

Department of Nutrition and Food Quality Assessment, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Online publish date: 2019-11-07
Publish date: 2019-11-18
Submission date: 2019-06-07
Final revision date: 2019-09-18
Acceptance date: 2019-09-27
 
Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2019;69(4):417–426
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this work, the effect of single fermentation of maize mashes with Fresco DVS 1010 culture (Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris, and Streptococcus thermophilus) was studied for 8 h (37°C) followed by a storage period of 21 days (6°C). Although milk is a typical growth medium for lactic acid cocci of the Fresco culture, fermentation increased its counts by about 3 log CFU/mL after 8 h (37°C), whereas pH of 4.54 and 4.69 was achieved after the fermentation in products with sucrose and caramel, respectively. Fermentation process was observed to significantly increase (p<0.05) the total phenolics content (143.9-206.1%) and the antioxidant activities (53.7-107.4%) of the samples. Potentially probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum HM1, Bifidobacterium choerinum K1/1, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum K4/4, Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. animalis J3II, and Bifidobacterium thermophilum DSM 20212 inoculated after the fermentation process were well maintained (>5 log CFU/mL) in combination with the mixed Fresco culture in the prepared maize products within 21 days of storage. Based on the overall sensory acceptance, caramel mashes after 12 days of storage period were evaluated as satisfactory (2.4 to 3.1 from 4.0), while 21-day stored products achieved good acceptability scores (3.0 to 3.6 from 4.0), hence the tendency of the positive effect of prolonged shelf-life was noted.
FUNDING
The authors would like to thank for the financial contribution from the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic VEGA no. 1/0363/19
 
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Asuero, A.G., Sayago, A., González, A.G. (2006). The correlation coefficient: An overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36(1), 41–59.
 
2.
Baranyi, J., Roberts, A.T. (1995). Mathematics of predictive food microbiology. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 26(2), 199-218.
 
3.
Blandino, A., Al-Aseeri, M.E., Pandiella, S.S., Cantero, D., Webb, C. (2003). Cereal-based fermented foods and beverages. Food Research International, 36(6), 527-543.
 
4.
Charalampopoulos, D., Wang, R., Pandiella, S.S., Webb, C. (2002). Application of cereals and cereal components in functional foods: a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 79(1-2), SI, 131-141.
 
5.
Coda, R., Rizzello, C.G., Trani, A., Gobbetti, M. (2011). Manufacture and characterization of functional emmer beverages fermented by selected lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiology, 28(3), 526-536.
 
6.
Cruz, A.G., Walter, E.H.M., Cadena, R.S., Faria, J.A.F., Bolini, H.M.A., Pinheiro, H.P., Santana, A.S. (2010). Survival analysis methodology to predict the shelf-life of probiotic flavoured yoghurt. Food Research International, 43(5), 1444-1448.
 
7.
Dinakar, P., Mistry, V. (1994). Growth and viability of Bifidobacterium bifidum in Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Science, 77(10), 2854-2864.
 
8.
Georgieva, R., Iliev, I., Haertlé, T., Chobert, J.M., Ivanova, I., Danova, S. (2009). Technological properties of candidate probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. International Dairy Journal, 19(11), 696-702.
 
9.
Gomes, A.M.P., Malcata, F.X. (1999). Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus acidophilus: biological, biochemical, technological and therapeutical properties relevant for use as probiotics. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 10(4-5), 139-157.
 
10.
Gueimonde, M., Delgado, S., Mayo, B., Ruas-Madiedo, P., Margolles, A., Reyes-Gavilán, C.G. (2004). Viability and diversity of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations included in commercial fermented milks. Food Research International, 37(9), 839-850.
 
11.
Hur, S.J., Lee, S.Y., Kim, Y.Ch., Choi, I., Kim, G.B. (2014). Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chemistry, 160, 346–356.
 
12.
ISO. (2010). 13299: Sensory analysis and general guidance for establishing a sensory profile. Brussel: CEN.
 
13.
Kailasapathy, K., Chin, J. (2000). Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunology and Cell Biology, 78(1), 80-88.
 
14.
Katina, K., Liukkonen, K.H., Kaukovirta-Norja, A., Adlercreutz, H., Heinonen, S.M., Lampi, A.M., Pihlava, J.M., Poutanen, K. (2007). Fermentation-induced changes in the nutritional value of native or germinated rye. Journal of Cereal Science, 46(3), 348–355.
 
15.
Kocková, M., Valík, Ľ. (2014). Development of new cereal-, pseudocereal-, and cereal-leguminous-based probiotic foods. Czech Journal of Food Science, 32(4), 391-397.
 
16.
Kongo, M., Gomes, A.M.P., Malcata, F.X. (2006). Manufacturing of fermented goat milk with a mixed starter culture of Bifidobacterium animalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus in a controlled bioreactor. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 42(6), 595-599.
 
17.
Kumar, M.S.Y., Dutta, R., Prasad, D., Misra, K. (2011). Subcritical water extraction of antioxidant compounds from Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) leaves for the comparative evaluation of antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry, 127(3), 1309–1316.
 
18.
Lamsal, B.P., Faubion, J.M. (2009). The beneficial use of cereal and cereal components in probiotic foods. Food Reviews International, 25(2), 103-114.
 
19.
Liptáková, D., Koreňová, J., Hornická, M., Valík, Ľ. (2016). Mikrobiologická analýza materského mlieka. Lekársky obzor, 65, 227-231 (in Slovak).
 
20.
Matejčeková, Z., Liptáková, D., Valík, Ľ. (2017). Functional probiotic products based on fermented buckwheat with Lactobacillus rhamnosus. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 81, 35-41.
 
21.
Matejčeková, Z., Soltészová, F., Ačai, P., Liptáková, D., Valík, Ľ. (2018). Application of Lactobacillus plantarum in functional products based on fermented buckwheat. Journal of Food Science, 83(4), 1053-1062.
 
22.
Mikulajová, A., Takácsová, M., Alexy, P., Brindzová, L. (2007a). Optimalization of extraction of phenolic compounds from buckwheat on the basis of results of experimental design method. Chemické Listy, 101(7), 563–568.
 
23.
Mikulajová, A., Takácsová, M., Rapta, P., Brindzová, L., Zalibera, M., Németh, K. (2007b). Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of cereal and pseudocereal genotypes. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 46(4), 150–157.
 
24.
Mikulajová, A., Kohajdová, Z., Németh, K., Hybenová, E. (2015). Phenolic contents, antioxidant properties, and sensory profiles of wheat round rolls supplemented with whole grain cereals. Acta Alimentaria, 44(1), 76–85.
 
25.
Muniandy, P., Shori, A.B., Baba, A.S. (2016). Influence of green, white and black tea addition on the antioxidant activity of probiotic yogurt during refrigerated storage. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 8, 1–8.
 
26.
Ogunremi, O.R., Agrawal, R., Sanni, A.I. (2015). Development of cereal-based functional food using cereal-mix substrate fermented with probiotic strain – Pichia kudriavzevii OG32. Food Science and Nutrition, 3(6), 486-494.
 
27.
Nout, M.J. (2009). Rich nutrition from the poorest – cereal fermentations in Africa and Asia. Food Microbiology, 26(7), 685-692.
 
28.
Pelikánová, J., Liptáková, D., Valík, Ľ. (2015). Suitability of lactic acid bacteria for fermentation of maize and amaranth. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 54(4), 354-364.
 
29.
Picard, C., Fioramonti, J., Francois, A., Robinson, T., Neant, F., Matuchansky, C. (2005). Review article: bifidobacteria as probiotic agents – physiological effects and clinical benefits. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 22(6), 495-512.
 
30.
Pohanka, M., Bandouchova, H., Sobotka, J., Sedlackova, J., Soukupova, I., Pikula, J. (2009). Ferric reducing antioxidant power and square wave voltammetry for assay of low molecular weight antioxidants in blood plasma: Performance and comparison of methods. Sensors, 9(11), 9094–9103.
 
31.
Prado, F.C., Parada, J.L., Pandey, A., Soccol, C.R. (2008). Trends in non-dairy probiotic beverages. Food Research International, 41(2), 111-123.
 
32.
Rathore, S., Salmeron, I., Pandiella, S. (2012). Production of potentially probiotic beverages using single and mixed cereal substrates fermented with lactic acid bacteria cultures. Food Microbiology, 30(1), 239-244.
 
33.
Rufino, M.S.M., Alves, R.E., Brito, E.S., Pérez-Jiménez, J., Saura-Calixto, F., Mancini-Filho, J. (2010). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacities of 18 non-traditional tropical fruits from Brazil. Food Chemistry, 121(4), 996-1002.
 
34.
Salar, R.K., Čertík, M., Brezová, V. (2012). Modulation of phenolic content and antioxidant activity of maize by solid state fermentation with Thamnidium elegans CCF 1456. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 17(1), 109–116.
 
35.
Salmerón, I., Thomas, K., Pandiella, S.S. (2014). Effect of substrate composition and inoculum on the fermentation kinetics and flavour compound profiles of potentially non-dairy probiotic formulations. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 55(1), 240-247.
 
36.
Schmidt, C.G., Gonçalves, L.M., Prietto, L., Hackbart, H.S., Furlong, E.B. (2014). Antioxidant activity and enzyme inhibition of phenolic acids from fermented rice bran with fungus Rizhopus oryzae. Food Chemistry, 146, 371–377.
 
37.
STN EN ISO 8586-2. (2014). Sensory analysis - general guidance for selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Bratislava: Slovak Standard Institute.
 
38.
STN ISO 15214. (2002). Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for enumeration of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria. Colony-count technique. Bratislava: Slovak Institute of Technical Normalization.
 
39.
Stone, H., Bleibaum, R.N., Thomas, H. . (2012). Sensory Evaluation Practices (4th ed.), Elsevier, New York, p. 446.
 
40.
Wang, Ch.Y., Wu, S.J., Shyu, Y.T. (2014). Antioxidant properties of certain cereals as affected by food-grade bacteria fermentation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 117(4), 449–456.
 
41.
Yen, G.Ch., Chen, H.Y. (1995). Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation to their mutagenicity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43(1), 27–32.
 
42.
Yu, L., Haley, S., Perret, J., Harris, M., Wilson, J., Qian, M. (2002). Free radical scavenging properties of wheat extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(6), 1619–1624.
 
43.
Zielińska, D., Kolozyn-Krajewska, D. (2018). Food-origin lactic acid bacteria may exhibit probiotic properties: review. BioMed Research International, 2018, art. no. 5063185.
 
ISSN:1230-0322