Search for Author, Title, Keyword
Chemical Composition of Covered and Naked Spring Barley Varieties and Their Potential for Food Production
 
More details
Hide details
 
Publication date: 2017-06-30
 
 
Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2017;67(2):151-158
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
By developing new varieties suitable for production of healthy products, given the greater consumer and manufacturer focus on the functional ingredients and nutritional properties of barley, new opportunities to incorporate barley into human foods are created. Therefore, the aim of investigation was to analyze grain composition of barley varieties and perspective breeding lines bred in Latvia and evaluate its functional ingredients depending on varieties, year and nitrogen fertilizer rates. The content of protein, starch, β-glucans, total dietary fiber, composition of amino acids and α-tocopherol were determined in the studied samples. The results of two-year analysis showed that the protein content in barley grain samples ranged from 10.5 to 13.9%, total dietary fiber - from 18.74 to 20.82%, but the content of β-glucans ranged from 3.44 to 4.97%. The amount of α-tocopherol was determined to range from 7.21 to 8.58 mg/kg, and the sum of essential amino acids - from 31.5 to 38.9 g/kg. Although covered barley varieties demonstrated a higher content of such functional ingredients as α-tocopherol, total dietary fiber and β-glucans, naked barley grains had a higher protein content, the sum of essential amino acids, and, particularly lysine, was not far behind in recommended amount by nutrition experts.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Arendt E.K., Zannini E., Barley. 2013, in: Cereal Grains for the Food and Beverage Industries (ed. S.Hughes). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. pp. 155-200.
 
2.
ASN 3150 The determination of Total Dietary Fibre (TDF) in cereals –Phosphate buffer; Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, 2006-05-16.
 
3.
ASN 3151 The determination of Soluble (SDF) and Insoluble Dietary Fibre (IDF) in cereals – Phosphate buffer; Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, 2006-05-16.
 
4.
Baik B.K., Ullrich S.E., Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J. Cereal Sci., 2008, 48, 233–242.
 
5.
Biel W., Jacyno E., Chemical composition and nutritive value of spring hulled barley varieties. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 2013, 19, 4, 721-727.
 
6.
Bleidere M., Zute S., Brunava L., Bobere N., Jākobsone I., Yield and grain quality of hulless spring barley in field trials under different nitrogen management conditions. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of science. Section B, 2013b, 67, 3, 229–235.
 
7.
Bleidere M., Zute S., Jākobsone I., Characterisation of physical and biochemical traits of hulless spring barley grain in Latvian breeding program. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Science. Section B, 2013a, 67, 4/5, 399-404.
 
8.
Cavallero A., Gianineti A., Finocchiaro D.A., Stanca A.M., Tocols in hull-less and hulled barley genotypes grown in contrasting environments. J. Cereal Sci., 2004, 39, 175-180.
 
9.
Duffus C.M., Cochrane, M.P. Formation of the barley grain – Morphology, physiology and biochemistry. 1993, in:. Barley: Chemistry and Technology (eds. A.W. Macgregor, R.S. Bhatty). St Paul, MN: AACC International, Inc., pp. 31–72.
 
10.
Falk J., Krahnstover A., Van der Kooij T.A., Schlensog M., Krupinska K., Tocopherol and tocotrienol accumulation during development of caryopses from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Phytochemistry, 2004, 65, 2977-2985.
 
11.
Fastnaught C.E., Barley fiber. 2001. in: Handbook of Dietary Fiber (ed. Dreher C.M.). New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 519–542.
 
12.
Gujral H.S., Gaur S., Instrumental texture of chapati as affected by barley flour, glycerol monostearate and sodium chloride. Int. J. Food Prop., 2005, 8, 377-385.
 
13.
Guler M., Barley grain beta-glucan content as affected by nitrogen and irrigation. Field Crops Res., 2003, 84, 335–340.
 
14.
Hang A., Obert D., Gironella A.I.N., Burton C.S., Barley amylose and beta-glucan: Their relationships to protein, agronomic traits, and environmental factors. Crop Sci., 2007, 47, 1754–1760.
 
15.
Hirel B., Tetu T., Lea P.J., Dubois F., Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crops for Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability, 2011, 3, 1452-1485.
 
16.
 
17.
Jenkins A.L., Jenkins D.J.A., Zdravkovic U., Wursch P., Vuksan V., Depression of the glycaemic index by high levels of beta-glucan fiber in two functional foods tested in type 2 diabetes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 2002, 56, 622–628.
 
18.
Kalra S., Jood S., Effect of dietary barley β-glucan on cholesterol and lipoprotein fractions in rats. J. Cereal Sci., 2000, 31, 141-145.
 
19.
Kerckhoffs D.A.J.M., Brouns F., Hornstra G., Mensink R.P., Effects on the human serum lipoprotein profile of β-glucan, soy protein and isoflavones, plant sterols and stanols, garlic and tocotrienols. J. Nutr., 2002, 132, 2494–2505.
 
20.
Mitsou E.K., Panopoulou N., Turunen K., Spiliotis V., Kyriacou A., Prebiotic potential of barley derived β-glucan at low intake levels: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study. Food Res. Int., 2010, 43, 1086–1092.
 
21.
Moreau R.A., Wayns K.E., Flores R.A., Hicks K.B., Tocopherols and tocotrienols in barley oil prepared from germ and other fractions from scarification and sieving of hulless barley. Cereal Chem. J., 2007, 84, 587–592.
 
22.
Newman C.W., Newman R.K., Hulless barley for food and feed. 2005, in: Specialty Grains for Food and Feed (eds E. Abdelaal, P. Wood). St Paul, MN: AACC International, Inc., pp.167–202.
 
23.
Newman R.K., Newman C.W., Barley: Genetics and nutrient composition. 2008, in: Barley for Food and Health: Science, Technology, and Products. John Whiley and Sons. Inc., pp. 56-94.
 
24.
Paynter B.H., Harasymow S.E., Variation in grain β-glucan due to site, cultivar and nitrogen fertiliser in Western Australia. Crop Pasture Sci., 2010, 61(12), 1017-1026.
 
25.
Qi J.C., Zhang G.P., Zhou M.X., Protein and hordein content in barley seeds as affected by nitrogen level and their relationship to beta-amylase activity. J. Cereal Sci., 2006, 43, 102–107.
 
26.
Shewry P.R. Improving the protein content and composition of cereal grain. J. Cereal Sci., 2007, 46, 239–250.
 
27.
Tiwari U., Cummins E. A predictive model of the effects of genotypic, pre- and postharvest stages on barley β-glucan levels. J. Sci. Food Agric., 2008, 88, 2277–2287.
 
28.
WHO/FAO/UNU, ‘Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition, Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation, World Health Organization Technical Report Series 935. WHO, 2007, Geneva.
 
29.
Wood P.J., Relationships between solution properties of cereal b-glucans and physiological effects—a review. Trends Food Sci. Tech., 2004, 13, 313–320.
 
30.
Zielinski H., Ciska E., Kozlowska H., The cereal grains: Focus on vitamin E. Czech J. Food Sci., 2001, 19, 182–188.
 
 
CITATIONS (35):
1.
 
2.
 
3.
 
4.
 
5.
 
6.
 
7.
 
8.
 
9.
 
10.
 
11.
 
12.
 
13.
 
14.
 
15.
 
16.
 
17.
 
18.
 
19.
 
20.
 
21.
 
22.
 
23.
 
24.
 
25.
 
26.
 
27.
 
28.
 
29.
 
30.
 
31.
 
32.
 
33.
 
34.
 
35.
 
eISSN:2083-6007
ISSN:1230-0322
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top