Search for Author, Title, Keyword
Current issue
In press
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Policies
Instructions for Authors
1/2026 vol. 76
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Cultivar- and Growth-Stage-Dependent Variability of Saponins in Roots and Leaves of Beta vulgaris L. Characterized by Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Anna Tekieli 1
,
 
Kamila Frącek 1
,
 
Giorgia Perelli 2
,
 
Szymon Janecki 1
,
 
Aneta Spórna-Kucab 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Chemical Technology and Environmental Analysis, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland
 
2
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-11-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-03-02
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-03-20
 
 
Publication date: 2026-03-20
 
 
Corresponding author
Aneta Spórna-Kucab   

Department of Chemical Technology and Environmental Analysis, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155, Kraków, Poland
 
 
Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2026;76(1):106-117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31883/pjfns/218708
 
 
Article (PDF)
Supplementary files
References (48)
 
KEYWORDS
oleanane-type aglycones
plant metabolomics
seasonal variation
secondary metabolites
triterpene glycosides
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Beta vulgaris L. is an important food crop and a rich source of bioactive triterpene saponins. This study evaluated cultivar- and growth-stage-dependent variability of saponins in leaves and roots of three beet cultivars (Round Dark Red, Cylindra, and Snow Ball) and in leaves of Swiss chard (Rhubarb Chard), harvested at seven harvest dates between June and September 2024. Saponins were identified and quantified using liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-MS/MS). A total of 32 triterpene saponins representing oleanane-type, akebonoic acid-, hederagenin-, and gypsogenin-derived aglycones were detected. Pronounced organ-dependent differences were observed. Total saponin content ranged from 386 to 10,414 mg/kg fresh weight (FW) in leaves and from 1,170 to 23,298 mg/kg FW in roots. Two-way analysis of variance confirmed highly significant effects of cultivar, harvest time, and their interaction on total saponin levels in both leaves and roots (all p<0.0001). Roots exhibited a broader content range and a pronounced mid-season maximum, whereas leaf saponin levels generally peaked in the mid-to-late season in a genotype-dependent pattern. Major saponins (Act-UrA-akebonoic acid and betavulgarosides II, III, IV, and VII) predominated in the quantitative profile and exhibited coordinated seasonal variation. Multivariate analyses (principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis) clearly separated samples according to plant organ and further resolved cultivar- and season-related patterns. Overall, saponin accumulation in B. vulgaris is strongly regulated by organ type, genotype, and growth stage, emphasizing the importance of cultivar selection and harvest timing for maximizing bioactive potential.
FUNDING
This research was funded in whole by National Science Centre, Poland for the years 2024–2027 (Project No. UMO-2023/49/N/NZ9/01706).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Arslan I. (2017). A new acylated and oleanane-type triterpenoid saponin from Gypsophila arrostii roots. International Journal of Food Properties, 20(3), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1168437
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Arslan I. (2020). Quillaic acid–containing saponin-based immunoadjuvants trigger early immune responses. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 30(4), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43450-020-00080-y
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Arslan I., Cenzano A.M. (2021). Characterization of triterpene saponins from Gypsophila arrostii by electrospray ionization ion trap multiple-stage mass spectrometry. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 31(1), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43450-021-00125-w
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Biswas T., Dwivedi U.N. (2019). Plant triterpenoid saponins: biosynthesis, in vitro production, and pharmacological relevance. Protoplasma, 256, 1463–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01411-0
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Böttger S., Melzig M.F. (2013). The influence of saponins on cell membrane cholesterol. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 21(22), 7118–7124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.09.008
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Castellano J.M., Ramos-Romero S., Perona J.S. (2022). Oleanolic acid: Extraction, Characterization and biological activity. Nutrients, 14(3), art. no. 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030623
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Cheng L., Shi L., Wu J., Zhou X., Li X., Sun X., Zhu L., Xia T.S., Ding Q. (2018). A hederagenin saponin isolated from Clematis ganpiniana induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells via the mitochondrial pathway. Oncology Letters, 15(2), 1737–1743. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7494
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Ciftci H.I., Ozturk S.E., Ali T.F.S., Radwan M.O., Tateishi H., Koga R., Ocak Z., Can M., Otsuka M., Fujita M. (2018). The first pentacyclic triterpenoid gypsogenin derivative exhibiting anti-ABL1 kinase and anti-chronic myelogenous leukemia activities. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 41(4), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b17-00902
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Dirir A.M., Daou M., Yousef A.F., Yousef L.F. (2022). A review of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors from plants as potential candidates for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. Phytochemistry Reviews, 21, 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-021-09773-1
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Edelmann M., Dawid C., Hochreiter K., Ralla T., Stark T.D., Salminen H., Weiss J., Hofmann T. (2020a). Molecularization of foam-active saponins from sugar beet side streams (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris var. altissima). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68(39), 10962–10974. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04603
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Edelmann M., Dawid C., Ralla T., Stark T.D., Salminen H., Weiss J., Hofmann T. (2020b). Fast and sensitive LC–MS/MS method for the quantitation of saponins in various sugar beet materials. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68(50), 15027–15035. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05836
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Engholm D.H., Kilian M., Goodsell D.S., Andersen E.S., Kjærgaard R.S. (2017). A visual review of the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(6), 854–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux037
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Favel A., Steinmetz M.D., Regli P., Vidal-Ollivier E., Elias R., Balansard G. (1994). In vitro antifungal activity of triterpenoid saponins. Planta Medica, 60(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-959407
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Francis G., Kerem Z., Makkar H.P., Becker K. (2002). The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review. British Journal of Nutrition, 88(6), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002725
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Günther A., Bednarczyk-Cwynar B. (2025). Oleanolic acid: A promising antioxidant – sources, mechanisms of action, therapeutic potential, and enhancement of bioactivity. Antioxidants, 14(5), art. no. 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14050598
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Gupta N. (2022). A review on recent developments in the anticancer potential of oleanolic acid and its analogs (2017-2020). Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 22(4), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557521666210810153627
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Ida Y., Satoh Y., Katsumata M., Nagasao M., Shoji J. (1995). Achyranthosides C and D, novel glucuronide saponins from Achyranthes fauriei root. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 43(5), 896–898. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.43.896
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Jolly A., Hour Y., Lee Y.C. (2024). An outlook on the versatility of plant saponins: A review. Fitoterapia, 174, art. no. 105858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2024.105858
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Kaur R., Mishra V., Gupta S., Sharma S., Vaishnav A., Singh S.V. (2024). Industrial and environmental applications of plant-derived saponins: An overview and future prospective. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 43, 3012–3026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11201-x
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Kinjo J., Okawa M., Udayama M., Shono Y., Hirakawa T., Shii Y., Nohara T. (1999). Hepatoprotective and hepatotoxic actions of oleanolic acid-type triterpenoidal glucuronides on rat primary hepatocyte cultures. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 47(2), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.47.290
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Krasteva I., Yotova M., Yosifov D., Benbassat N., Jenett-Siems K., Konstantinov S. (2014). Cytotoxicity of gypsogenic acid isolated from Gypsophila trichotoma. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 10(Sup. 2), S430–S433.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Kregiel D., Berlowska J., Witonska I., Antolak H., Proestos C., Babic M., Babic L., Zhang B. (2017). Chapter 6 – Saponin-based, biological-active surfactants from plants. In R. Najjar (Ed.), Application and Characterization of Surfactants, IntechOpen, pp. 184–197. https://doi.org/10.5772/68062
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Lisiak N.M., Lewicka I., Kaczmarek M., Kujawski J., Bednarczyk-Cwynar B., Zaprutko L., Rubis B. (2021). Oleanolic acid’s semisynthetic derivatives HIMOXOL and br-HIMOLID show proautophagic potential and inhibit migration of HER2-positive breast cancer cells in vitro. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(20), art. no. 11273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222011273
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Liu J., Lu Y.F., Wu Q., Xu S.F., Shi F.G., Klaassen C.D. (2019). Oleanolic acid reprograms the liver to protect against hepatotoxicants, but is hepatotoxic at high doses. Liver International, 39(3), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13940
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Mikołajczyk-Bator K., Błaszczyk A., Czyżniejewski M., Kachlicki P. (2016a). Characterisation and identification of triterpene saponins in the roots of red beets (Beta vulgaris L.) using two HPLC–MS systems. Food Chemistry, 192, 979–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.111
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Mikołajczyk-Bator K., Błaszczyk A., Czyżniejewski M., Kachlicki P. (2016b) Identification of saponins from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) by low and high-resolution HPLC–MS/MS. Journal of Chromatography B, 1029–1030, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.038
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Mikołajczyk-Bator K., Błaszczyk A., Czyżniejewski M., Kachlicki P., Stochmal A. (2024). Metabolite profiling of triterpene saponins from different red beetroot cultivars using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 130, art. no. 106141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106141
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Mroczek A., Klimczak U., Kowalczyk M. (2021). Determination of saponins in leaves of four Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars by UHPLC-CAD/QTOF-MS/MS. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 71(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.31883/pjfns/134623
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Mroczek A. (2015). Phytochemistry and bioactivity of triterpene saponins from Amaranthaceae family. Phytochemistry Reviews, 14, 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-015-9394-4
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Mroczek A., Kapusta I., Janda B., Janiszowska W. (2012). Triterpene saponin content in the roots of red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(50), 12397–12402. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf303952x
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Mroczek A., Kapusta I., Stochmal A., Janiszowska W. (2019). MS/MS and UPLC-MS profiling of triterpenoid saponins from leaves and roots of four red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Phytochemistry Letters, 30, 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2019.02.015
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Sen A. (2020). Prophylactic and therapeutic roles of oleanolic acid and its derivatives in several diseases. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 8(10), 1767–1792. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1767
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Sharma K., Sharma S., Vaishnav A., Jain R., Singh D., Singh H.B., Goel A., Singh S. (2022). Salt-tolerant PGPR strain Priestia endophytica SK1 promotes fenugreek growth under salt stress by inducing nitrogen assimilation and secondary metabolites. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 133(5), 2802–2813. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15735
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Spórna-Kucab A., Tekieli A., Skalicka-Woźniak K., Grzegorczyk A., Świergosz T., Wybraniec S. (2022). Characterization of triterpene saponin composition of white, yellow and red beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.). Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 72(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.31883/pjfns/149515
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Spórna-Kucab A.E., Wybraniec S. (2020). High-speed counter-current chromatography in separation and identification of saponins from Beta vulgaris L. cultivar Red Sphere. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 70(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.31883/pjfns/116416
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Su F., Sui X., Xu J., Liu Q., Li J., Liu W., Xu L., Zhang Z., Tao F. (2024). Hederagenin suppresses ovarian cancer via targeting mitochondrial fission through dynamin-related protein 1. European Journal of Pharmacology, 963, art. no. 176188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176188
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Sun K.P., Zhao T.T., Liu L., Mu X.D., Sun J.Y. (2023). Anticancer structure-activity relationships and potential target exploration of the natural product gypsogenin. ChemistrySelect, 8(10), art. no. e202300072. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202300072
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
De Tommasi N., Conti C., Stein M.L., Pizza C. (1991). Structure and in vitro antiviral activity of triterpenoid saponins from Calendula arvensis. Planta Medica, 57(3), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-960084
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Tekieli A., Kowalczyk M., Wybraniec S., Spórna-Kucab A. (2026). pH-dependent separation and identification of saponins from Beta vulgaris L. using high-speed countercurrent chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1769, art. no. 466643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466643
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Vincken J.P., Heng L., de Groot A., Gruppen H. (2007). Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry, 68(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.10.008
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Wang J., Xu Q.L., Zheng M.F., Ren H., Lei T., Wu P., Zhou Z.Y., Wei X.Y., Tan J.W. (2014). Bioactive 30-noroleanane triterpenes from the pericarps of Akebia trifoliata. Molecules, 19(4), 4301–4312. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19044301
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Wen F., Chen S., Wang Y., Wu Q., Yan J., Pei J., Zhou T. (2023). The synthesis of Paris saponin VII mainly occurs in leaves and is promoted by light intensity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, art. no. 1199215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1199215
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Xie W., Fang X., Li H., Lu X., Yang D., Han S., Bi Y. (2023). Advances in the anti-tumor potential of hederagenin and its analogs. European Journal of Pharmacology, 959, art. no. 176073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176073
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Yoon Y., Choi K. H. (2010). Identification of inhibitory effect on Streptococcus mutans by oleanolic acid. Journal of Life Science, 20(3), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2010.20.3.321
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Yoshikawa M., Murakami T., Kadoya M., Matsuda H., Muraoka O., Yamahara J., Murakami N. (1996). Medicinal foodstuffs. III. Sugar beet. (1): Hypoglycemic oleanolic acid oligoglycosides, betavulgarosides, I, II, III, and IV, from the root of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae). Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 44(6), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.44.1212
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Yoshikawa M., Murakami T., Kadoya M., Yamahara J., Matsuda H. (1998). Medicinal foodstuffs. XV. Sugar beet. (2): Structures of betavulgarosides V, VI, VII, VIII, IX and X from the roots and leaves of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L., Chenopodiaceae). Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 46(11), 1758–1763. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.46.1758
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Yu X.L., He Y. (2018). Tea saponins: effective natural surfactants beneficial for soil remediation, from preparation to application. RSC Advances, 8(43), 24312–24321. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA02859A
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Zeng J., Huang T., Xue M., Chen J., Feng L., Du R., Feng Y. (2018). Current knowledge and development of hederagenin as a promising medicinal agent: a comprehensive review. RSC Advances, 8(43), 24188–24202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA03666G
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Betaxanthin Profiling in Beta vulgaris Leaves and Gymnocalycium mihanovichii Grafted Cacti: A Comprehensive Study
Composition and Significance of Bacterial Microbiota and Volatile Organic Compounds of Swiss-Dutch-Type Cheese as Determined by PCR-DGGE and HS-GC
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2083-6007
ISSN:1230-0322
Journals System - logo
W latach 2022-2024 kwartalnik naukowy Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences realizuje projekt nr RCN/SP/0520/2021/1 finansowany ze środków budżetu państwa – Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki w ramach programu „Rozwój czasopism naukowych”. Dofinansowanie wynosi 120 000 zł. W ramach projektu podejmowane są działania zmierzające do podniesienia poziomu praktyk wydawniczych i edytorskich, zwiększenia wpływu czasopism na rozwój nauki oraz utrzymania się czasopism w międzynarodowym obiegu naukowym.

In the years 2022-2024, the scientific quarterly Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences accomplishes a project no. RCN/SP/0520/2021/1 financed from the state budged – Ministry of Education and Science Republic of Poland in the framework of a program “Development of scientific journals”. The financing amounts to 120,000 PLN. The program aims at improving the level of publishing and editing practices, increasing the impact of scientific journals on science development, and extending the international range of scientific journals.
© 2006-2026 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top